Judgment_paragraph 22 · Thermalhotel Fontana Hotelbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Südoststeiermark (C-411/22)

22In that regard, it should be borne in mind that the distinction between benefits falling within the scope of Regulation No 883/2004 and those which are outside it is based essentially on the constituent elements of each benefit, in particular its purpose and the conditions for its grant, and not on whether it is classified as a social security benefit by national legislation (judgment of 15 July 2021, A (Public health care), C‑535/19, EU:C:2021:595, paragraph 28 and the case-law cited).

Thermalhotel Fontana Hotelbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Südoststeiermark (C-411/22)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections