Judgment_paragraph 23 · Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v M.A (C-402/22)

23So far as concerns the first of those conditions, it must be recalled at the outset in accordance with both the need for uniform application of EU law and the principle of equality, the terms of a provision of EU law which, like Article 14(4)(b) of Directive 2011/95, makes no express reference to the law of the Member States for the purpose of determining its meaning and scope must normally be given an independent and uniform interpretation throughout the European Union (see, to that effect, judgments of 13 September 2018, Ahmed, C‑369/17, EU:C:2018:713, paragraph 36, and of 15 November 2022, Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, C‑646/20, EU:C:2022:879, paragraph 40).

Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v M.A (C-402/22)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections