Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission (C-385/22 P)
The procedure before the General Court…
40

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission (C-385/22 P)

Judgment of 26 Feb 2026law://eu/cjeu/2022/c-385-22/para_40@2026-11-12

40By decision of 1 July 2019, that case was joined with Case T‑323/17, Martinair Holland v Commission, for the purposes of the oral part of the procedure.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-385/22 P · ECLI:EU:C:2026:130
Decided: 26 Feb 2026
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: I. Jarukaitis
Advocate General: A. Rantos
Bench: 3 judges
I. Jarukaitis, E. Regan, D. Gratsias
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62022CJ0385

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

26 Feb 2026Reading

Connections

Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; UL and SA Royal Antwerp Football Club v Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL (C-680/21); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); thyssenkrupp AG v European Commission (C-581/22 P); Planistat Europe and Hervé-Patrick Charlot v European Commission (C-363/22 P); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); Pometon SpA v European Commission (C-440/19 P); Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission (C-31/23 P); UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV v European Commission (C-262/23); Intel Corp. v European Commission (C-413/14 P); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); TUIfly GmbH v European Commission (C-763/21); Deltafina SpA v European Commission (C-578/11 P); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-209/21 P); Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission (C-70/23 P); John Deere Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-7/95 P); Mindo Srl v European Commission (C-652/11 P); Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v European Commission (C-201/11 P); Covestro Deutschland AG and Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-790/21 P); Opinion of the Advocate General (C-367/22); Martinair Holland NV v European Commission (T-323/17); Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission (T-28/11)