Judgment_paragraph 73 · Air Canada v European Commission (C-367/22 P)

73In the fourth place, in so far as Air Canada submits that the General Court erred in law in finding that the conduct at issue was sufficiently harmful to competition in the internal market to be regarded as a restriction of competition by object, it is sufficient to recall that, in accordance with settled case-law, the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice when examining an appeal is confined to a review of the findings of law made in relation to the pleas and arguments debated before the General Court. A party cannot therefore put forward for the first time before the Court of Justice a plea in law which it has not raised before the General Court, since that would amount to allowing that party to bring before the Court of Justice, whose jurisdiction in appeals is limited, a case of wider ambit than that which came before the General Court. In an appeal, the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice is confined to a review of the findings of law made in relation to the pleas and arguments debated before the General Court (judgments of 14 October 2010, Deutsche Telekom v Commission, C‑280/08 P, EU:C:2010:603, paragraph 34, and of 2 February 2023, Spain and Others v Commission, C‑649/20 P, C‑658/20 P and C‑662/20 P, EU:C:2023:60, paragraph 29 and the case-law cited).