Judgment_paragraph 55 · AUTOTECHNICA FLEET SERVICES d.o.o. v Hrvatska agencija za nadzor financijskih usluga (C-278/22)

55It is apparent from the Court’s case-law, first, that any national measure in a sphere which has been the subject of full harmonisation at EU level must be assessed in the light of the provisions of the harmonising measure and not those of the Treaty and, second, that Articles 9 to 13 of Directive 2006/123 provide for exhaustive harmonisation concerning the services falling within their scope (judgment of 14 July 2016, Promoimpresa and Others, C‑458/14 and C‑67/15, EU:C:2016:558, paragraphs 59 and 61). In those circumstances, and as the Advocate General observed, in substance, in point 64 of his Opinion, the second question must be examined in the light of that directive, without it being necessary to refer to Article 49 TFEU, relating to freedom of establishment.

AUTOTECHNICA FLEET SERVICES d.o.o. v Hrvatska agencija za nadzor financijskih usluga (C-278/22)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections