Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
R.I. v Inspecţia Judiciară and N.L (C-817/21)
Consideration of the question referred
Substance
54

R.I. v Inspecţia Judiciară and N.L (C-817/21)

Judgment of 11 May 2023law://eu/cjeu/2021/c-817-21/para_54@2026-11-10

54The existence of that kind of control cannot, however, be regarded as being, as such, incompatible with the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-817/21 · ECLI:EU:C:2023:391
Decided: 11 May 2023
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (Court of Appeal, Bucharest, Romania)
Applicant: R.I.
Defendants: Inspecţia Judiciară; N.L.
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: A.M. Collins
Bench: 5 judges
A. Arabadjiev, L. Bay Larsen, P.G. Xuereb, T. von Danwitz, I. Ziemele
Language: Romanian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62021CJ0817

Topics

External action

History · 1 version

11 May 2023Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; 2006/928/EC: Commission Decision of 13 December 2006 establishing a mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption (notified under document number C(2006) 6569)
Cited by 4: Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet (C-313/23); MJ v AA (C-521/21); EA v Artemis security SAS (C-367/23); Asociaţia “Forumul Judecătorilor din România” and YN v Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii (C-216/21)2 provisions
Cites 16: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; A. K. and Others v Sąd Najwyższy, CP v Sąd Najwyższy and DO v Sąd Najwyższy (C-585/18, C-624/18, C-625/18); Skarb Państwa Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej reprezentowany przez Generalnego Dyrektora Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad v TOTO SpA - Costruzioni Generali and Vianini Lavori SpA (C-581/20); Criminal proceedings against PM and Others (C-357/19); Asociaţia 'Forumul Judecătorilor din România' and Others v Inspecţia Judiciară and Others (C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19, C-397/19); Randstad Italia SpA v Umana SpA and Others (C-497/20); Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru (C-896/19); Johannes Dietrich and Norbert Häring v Hessischer Rundfunk (C-422/19, C-423/19); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-791/19); A.B. and Others v Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa and Others (C-824/18); Proceedings brought by RS (C-430/21); Criminal proceedings against Lluís Puig Gordi and Others (C-158/21); 2006/928/EC: Commission Decision of 13 December 2006 establishing a mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption (notified under document number C(2006) 6569); Energieversorgungscenter Dresden-Wilschdorf GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-938/19)