Contents
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber)28 April 2022note(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff headings — Subheading 441820 — Scope — Doors and their frames and thresholds — MDF panels and mouldings — The first part of general rule 2(a) for the interpretation of the combined nomenclature — Incomplete or unfinished article — Definition)In Case C‑72/21,REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Supreme Court (Senate), Latvia), made by decision of 2 February 2021, received at the Court on 4 February 2021, in the proceedings‘PRODEX’ SIAvValsts ieņēmumu dienests,THE COURT (Eighth Chamber),composed of: N. Jääskinen, President of the Chamber, N. Piçarra (Rapporteur) and M. Gavalec, Judges,Advocate General: T. Ćapeta,Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,having regard to the written procedure,after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:– ‘PRODEX’ SIA, by J. Kārkliņš, advokāts,– the Latvian Government, by K. Pommere, J. Davidoviča and E. Bārdiņš, acting as Agents,– The European Commission, by M. Salyková and E. Kalniņš, acting as Agents,having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion,gives the following
Judgment
Legal framework
The HS
The CN
The dispute in the main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
The questions referred for a preliminary ruling
Costs
Operative part
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.