Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Prestige and Limousine, S.L. v Área Metropolitana de Barcelona and Others (C-50/21)
The questions referred
Substance
The questions relating to Article 49 T…
–The existence of overriding reasons r…
78

Prestige and Limousine, S.L. v Área Metropolitana de Barcelona and Others (C-50/21)

Judgment of 8 Jun 2023law://eu/cjeu/2021/c-50-21/para_78@2026-11-11

78Furthermore, in order to qualify as an SGEI, a service must be provided in pursuance of a particular public service mission entrusted to the provider by the Member State concerned (judgment of 7 November 2018, Commission v Hungary, C‑171/17, EU:C:2018:881, paragraph 52).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-50/21 · ECLI:EU:C:2023:448
Decided: 8 Jun 2023
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (High Court of Justice of Catalonia, Spain)
Applicant: Prestige and Limousine SL
Defendants: Área Metropolitana de Barcelona; Asociación Nacional del Taxi (Antaxi) and 4 more
Asociación Profesional Élite Taxi; Sindicat del Taxi de Catalunya (STAC); Tapoca VTC1 SL; Agrupació Taxis Companys
Rapporteur: K. Lenaerts
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, L. Bay Larsen, P.G. Xuereb, A. Kumin, I. Ziemele
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62021CJ0050

Topics

Freedom of establishment State aid

History · 1 version

8 Jun 2023Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 5: INTERZERO Trajnostne rešitve za svet brez odpadkov d.o.o. and Others and Surovina, družba za predelavo odpadkov d.o.o. and Others (C-254/23)2 provisions; Criminal proceedings against HYA and Others (C-229/23); Cofidis v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (C-340/22); European Superleague Company, SL v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) (C-333/21); Asociación de Empresarios de Salones de Juego y Recreativos de la Comunidad Valenciana (Anesar-CV) and Others v Conselleria de Hacienda y Modelo Económico de la Generalitat Valenciana (C-718/23)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; College van Burgemeester en Wethouders van de gemeente Amersfoort v X BV and Visser Vastgoed Beleggingen BV v Raad van de gemeente Appingedam (C-360/15, C-31/16); Yellow Cab Verkehrsbetriebs GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien (C-338/09); Proceedings brought by Boriss Cilevičs and Others (C-391/20); Eric Libert and Others v Gouvernement flamand (C‑197/11) and All Projects & Developments NV and Others v Vlaamse Regering (C‑203/11) (C-197/11, C-203/11); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-400/08); Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Wiener Landesregierung and Oberösterreichische Landesregierung (C-169/07); Eesti Pagar AS v Ettevõtluse Arendamise Sihtasutus and Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium (C-349/17); Attanasio Group Srl v Comune di Carbognano (C-384/08); Criminal proceedings against VD bd]& (C-339/20); Canal Satélite Digital SL v Adminstración General del Estado, and Distribuidora de Televisión Digital SA (DTS) (C-390/99); Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Others v European Commission (C-66/16 P, C-67/16 P, C-68/16 P, C-69/16 P); European Commission v Hungary (C-171/17)2 provisions; Eventech Ltd v The Parking Adjudicator (C-518/13); UP v Centre public d’action sociale de Liège (C-825/21); Prestige and Limousine, S.L. v Área Metropolitana de Barcelona and Others (C-50/21); Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. v European Commission and Republic of Poland (C-933/19 P); Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland and Others v European Commission (C-817/18 P)