Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
D.V. v M.A (C-395/21)
Consideration of the questions referred
The fifth and sixth questions
65

D.V. v M.A (C-395/21)

Judgment of 12 Jan 2023law://eu/cjeu/2021/c-395-21/para_65@2026-11-10

65By contrast, the referring court cannot supplement the contracts at issue in the main proceedings with its own estimate of a level of remuneration which it considers reasonable for the services provided.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-395/21 · ECLI:EU:C:2023:14
Decided: 12 Jan 2023
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Supreme Court of Lithuania)
Applicant: D.V.
Defendant: M.A.
Rapporteur: O. Spineanu-Matei
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 5 judges
C. Lycourgos, L.S. Rossi, J.‑C. Bonichot, S. Rodin, O. Spineanu-Matei
Language: Lithuanian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62021CJ0395

Topics

Approximation of laws Consumer protection

History · 1 version

12 Jan 2023Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Directive 93/13/EEC6 provisions
Cited by 9: Caixabank SA v X (C-565/21); ZL and Others v Provident Polska S.A (C-321/22); AM and PM v mBank S.A (C-139/22); Ocidental – Companhia Portuguesa de Seguros de Vida SA v LP (C-263/22); SIA 'A' v C and Others (C-365/23); Caixabank SA and Others v Asociación de Usuarios de Bancos, Cajas de Ahorro y Seguros de España (Adicae) and Others (C-450/22); Justa v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (C-39/24); FG v Caja Rural de Navarra SCC (C-699/23); R. A. and Others v „Luminor Bank AS“,agissant par intermédiaire de „Luminor Bank AS“ Lietuvos skyrius (C-645/22)2 provisions
Cites 14: Council Directive 93/13/EEC; CY and Others v Caixabank SA and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (C-224/19, C-259/19); Gyula Kiss and CIB Bank Zrt. v Emil Kiss and Gyuláné Kiss (C-621/17); Banca B. SA v A.A.A (C-269/19); Ruxandra Paula Andriciuc and Others v Banca Românească SA (C-186/16); Marc Gómez del Moral Guasch v Bankia SA (C-125/18); Árpád Kásler and Hajnalka Káslerné Rábai v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt (C-26/13); E.K. and Others v D.B.P. and Others (C-80/21); XZ v Ibercaja Banco, SA (C-452/18); Vicente v Delia (C-335/21); RWE Vertrieb AG v Verbraucherzentrale Nordrhein-Westfalen eV (C-92/11); Zsolt Sziber v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt (C-483/16); M.P. and B.P. v „A.” prowadzący działalność za pośrednictwem „A.” S.A (C-212/20); D.V. v M.A (C-395/21)