Judgment_paragraph 53 · European Union Intellectual Property Office v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR (C-382/21 P)

53Next, KaiKai submits that, by filling that gap by reference to the Paris Convention, the General Court did not directly apply that convention, by consequently disapplying Article 41(1) of that regulation, but interpreted the latter provision in the light of that convention, in accordance with the settled case-law of the Court of Justice, recalled inter alia in the judgment of 15 March 2012, SCF (C‑135/10, EU:C:2012:140, paragraph 51). The existence of that gap thus precludes any conflict with the case-law of the Court cited in paragraph 43 of the present judgment, which denies any direct effect to that convention.

European Union Intellectual Property Office v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR (C-382/21 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections