Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Sense Visuele Communicatie en Handel vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (C-36/21)
Consideration of the question referred
27

Sense Visuele Communicatie en Handel vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (C-36/21)

Judgment of 14 Jul 2022law://eu/cjeu/2021/c-36-21/para_27@2026-11-10

27It follows that, when implementing the provisions in Regulation No 1307/2013, national authorities are required to observe the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-36/21 · ECLI:EU:C:2022:556
Decided: 14 Jul 2022
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Administrative Court of Appeal for Trade and Industry, Netherlands)
Applicant: Sense Visuele Communicatie en Handel vof
Defendant: Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit
Rapporteur: K. Jürimäe
Advocate General: L. Medina
Bench: 5 judges
K. Jürimäe, N. Jääskinen, M. Safjan, N. Piçarra, M. Gavalec
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62021CJ0036

Topics

History · 1 version

14 Jul 2022Reading

Connections

Cited by 1: ‘BALTIC CONTAINER TERMINAL’ SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (C-376/23)2 provisions
Cites 11: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); SD v Agrárminiszter (C-490/18); Criminal proceedings against Mathieu Blaise and Others (C-616/17); Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas v Firma P. Krücken (C-316/86); Administratīvā rajona tiesa v Ministru kabinets (C-120/17); Vereniging Nationaal Overlegorgaan Sociale Werkvoorziening and Gemeente Rotterdam v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid and Sociaal Economische Samenwerking West-Brabant v Algemene Directie voor de Arbeidsvoorziening (C-383/06); Agroferm A/S v Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri (C-568/11); Asteris AE and others v Hellenic Republic and European Economic Community (C-106/87); Belgian State v Société coopérative Belovo (C-187/91); Erzeugerorganisation Tiefkühlgemüse eGen v Agrarmarkt Austria (C-516/16); Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009