Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
DN v Finanzamt Österreich (C-199/21)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first to third questions
33

DN v Finanzamt Österreich (C-199/21)

Judgment of 13 Oct 2022law://eu/cjeu/2021/c-199-21/para_33@2026-11-10

33Where several entitlements are payable under different national laws, the rules against overlapping benefits laid down in Article 68 of Regulation No 883/2004 must apply (see, to that effect, judgment of 18 September 2019, Moser, C‑32/18, EU:C:2019:752, paragraph 40).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Seventh Chamber
Case: C-199/21 · ECLI:EU:C:2022:789
Decided: 13 Oct 2022
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Bundesfinanzgericht (Federal Finance Court, Austria)
Applicant: DN
Defendant: Finanzamt Österreich
Rapporteur: F. Biltgen
Advocate General: P. Pikamäe
Bench: 3 judges
M.L. Arastey Sahún, F. Biltgen, J. Passer
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62021CJ0199

Topics

Freedom of movement for workers Social security

History · 1 version

13 Oct 2022Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland); Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems (Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland)
Cited by 1: L v Familienkasse Sachsen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (C-36/23)2 provisions
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Asociaţia 'Forumul Judecătorilor din România' and Others v Inspecţia Judiciară and Others (C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19, C-397/19); Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland); O.D. and Others v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (C-350/20); Bundesagentur für Arbeit - Familienkasse Sachsen v Tomislaw Trapkowski (C-378/14); Gudrun Schwemmer v Agentur für Arbeit Villingen-Schwenningen - Familienkasse (C-16/09); Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse v Michael Moser (C-32/18)2 provisions; Caisse de compensation des allocations familiales des régions de Charleroi et de Namur v Cosimo Laterza (C-733/79); Petra Würker v Familienkasse Nürnberg (C-32/13); DN v Finanzamt Österreich (C-199/21); Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems (Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland); Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants (C-802/18)