Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (C-132/21)
Consideration of the questions referred
Substance
47

BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (C-132/21)

Judgment of 12 Jan 2023law://eu/cjeu/2021/c-132-21/para_47@2026-11-10

47That said, the detailed rules for the implementation of those concurrent and independent remedies should not call into question the effectiveness and effective protection of the rights guaranteed by that regulation.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-132/21 · ECLI:EU:C:2023:2
Decided: 12 Jan 2023
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest High Court, Hungary)
Applicant: BE
Defendants: Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság; interested party:; Budapesti Elektromos Művek Zrt.
Rapporteur: I. Ziemele
Advocate General: J. Richard de la Tour
Bench: 5 judges
A. Arabadjiev, L. Bay Larsen, P.G. Xuereb, A. Kumin, I. Ziemele
Language: Hungarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62021CJ0132

Topics

Charter of Fundamental Rights Principles of Union law Protection of personal data

History · 1 version

12 Jan 2023Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation)4 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 13: VB v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (C-340/21); UF and AB v Land Hessen (C-26/22); UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-60/22); Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde v F R (C-416/23)2 provisions; Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC (C-169/23); ND v DR (C-21/23); Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet (C-313/23); Ferrovienord SpA v Nazionale di Statistica – ISTAT and Federazione Italiana Triathlon v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica - ISTAT and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze (C-363/21); M.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito (C-654/24); Criminal proceedings against MG (C-792/22); Zamestnik-ministar na regionalnoto razvitie i blagoustroystvoto i rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa 'Regioni v rastezh' 2014-2020 and Zamestnik-ministar na regionalnoto razvitie i blаgoustroystvoto i rakovoditel na Natsionalnia organ po Programa INTERREG V-A Rumania-Bulgaria 2014-2020 v Obshtina Razgrad and Obshtina Balchik (C-441/22); CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky (C-257/22); ZG v Beobank SA (C-351/21)
Cites 10: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy (C-73/16); Facebook Ireland Ltd and Others v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit (C-645/19); Vodafone Kabel Deutschland GmbH v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV (C-484/20); LM v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld (C-219/20); EPIC Financial Consulting Ges.m.b.H. v Republik Österreich and Bundesbeschaffung GmbH (C-274/21); BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (C-132/21)