85The jurisdiction of the Court of Justice to review the findings of fact by the General Court therefore extends, inter alia, to that of the substantive inaccuracy of those findings as apparent from the documents in the file, the legal characterisation thereof, distortion of the facts and evidence, and whether the rules relating to the burden of proof and the taking of evidence have been observed (judgments of 25 January 2007, Sumitomo Metal Industries and Nippon Steel v Commission, C‑403/04 P and C‑405/04 P, EU:C:2007:52, paragraph 39, and of 11 May 2017, Dyson v Commission, C‑44/16 P, EU:C:2017:357, paragraph 31).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.