Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Škoda Investement a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-712/20)
Background to the dispute
9

Škoda Investement a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-712/20)

law://eu/cjeu/2020/t-712-20/para_9@2026-11-13

Key facts

Court: General Court · Tenth Chamber
Case: T-712/20 · ECLI:EU:T:2021:700
Decided: 13 Oct 2021
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Škoda Investment a.s
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Rapporteur: D. Petrlík
Bench: 3 judges
A. Kornezov, G. Hesse, D. Petrlík
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62020TJ0712

Topics

History · 1 version

13 Oct 2021Reading

Judgment of 13 Oct 2021

9On 14 June 2019, EUIPO informed the applicant that it was apparent from the review of its opposition that it was inadmissible under Article 5(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 of 5 March 2018 supplementing Regulation 2017/1001 and repealing Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (OJ 2018 L 104, p. 1).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 3: Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-638/21); ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-612/21); ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-611/21)
Cites 7: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001; Kreuzmayr GmbH v Finanzamt Linz (C-628/16); Eddy's Snack Company GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-652/17); Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 of 18 May 2017 supplementing Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the European Union trade mark and repealing Commission Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 and (EC) No 216/96; Salvatore Gagliardi v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-392/04); British Airways plc v European Commission (C-122/16 P)