Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE v European Commission (T-540/20)

Judgment of 1 Mar 2023

law://eu/cjeu/2020/t-540-20/para_67@2026-11-13

67Thus, contrary to what the applicant claims, the provisions of the basic anti-subsidy regulation must be interpreted, as far as possible, in the light of the corresponding provisions of the SCM Agreement (judgment of 10 April 2019, Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission, T‑300/16, EU:T:2019:235, paragraph 101). The same is true of Article 3 of that regulation, which seeks to implement the content of Article 1 of the SCM Agreement (judgment of 10 April 2019, Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission, T‑300/16, EU:T:2019:235, paragraph 102).

Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE v European Commission (T-540/20)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections