Judgment_paragraph 64 · Cole Haan LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-399/20)

64As regards the applicant’s claim that the intervener should be ordered to pay the costs relating to the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal, it is sufficient to note that, since the present judgment dismisses the action brought against the contested decision, paragraph 2 of the operative part of that decision continues to govern the costs incurred in the opposition proceedings and in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO (see, to that effect, judgment of 19 October 2017, Aldi v EUIPO – Sky (SKYLITe), T‑736/15, not published, EU:T:2017:729, paragraph 131).

Cole Haan LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-399/20)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version