Contents
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber)7 April 2022note(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Classification of goods — Headings 1302, 3301 and 3302 — Extracted vanilla oleoresin — Excise duties — Directive 92/83/EEC — Exemptions — Article 27(1)(e) — Definition of flavour — Directive 92/12/EEC — Excise Committee of the European Commission — Powers)In Case C‑668/20,REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Finance Court, Germany), made by decision of 7 July 2020, received at the Court on 8 December 2020, in the proceedingsY GmbHvHauptzollamt,THE COURT (Ninth Chamber),composed of S. Rodin, President of the Chamber, C. Lycourgos (Rapporteur), President of the Fourth Chamber, and L.S. Rossi, Judge,Advocate General: G. Pitruzzella,Registrar: M. Krausenböck,having regard to the written procedure,after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:– Y GmbH, by H. Bleier, Rechtsanwalt,– the Hauptzollamt, by B. Geyer, acting as Agent,– the Czech Government, by M. Smolek, O. Serdula and J. Vláčil, acting as Agents,– the European Commission, by C. Perrin and M. Salyková and by R. Pethke, acting as Agents,having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion,gives the following
Judgment
Legal context
European Union law
Explanatory Notes to the CN and Explanatory Notes to the HS
Directive 92/83
Directive 92/12
Directive 2008/118/EC
Guideline No 458 of the Commission’s Committee on Excise Duty of 19 November 2003
German law
The dispute in the main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
Consideration of the questions referred
The first to third questions
The fourth question
Costs
Operative part
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.