Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
HW and Others v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG (C-652/20)
Consideration of the question referred
44

HW and Others v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG (C-652/20)

Judgment of 30 Jun 2022law://eu/cjeu/2020/c-652-20/para_44@2026-11-10

44Article 5(1) of Regulation No 1215/2012 provides that, by way of derogation from that principle, persons domiciled in a Member State may be sued in the courts of another Member State by virtue of the rules set out in Sections 2 to 7 of Chapter II of that regulation.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Eighth Chamber
Case: C-652/20 · ECLI:EU:C:2022:514
Decided: 30 Jun 2022
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tribunalul Bucureşti (Regional Court, Bucharest, Romania)
Applicants: HW; ZF; MZ
Defendant: Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG
Rapporteur: N. Jääskinen
Advocate General: J. Richard de la Tour
Bench: 3 judges
N. Jääskinen, M. Safjan, M. Gavalec
Language: Romanian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62020CJ0652

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

30 Jun 2022Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EU) No 1215/20122 provisions
Cited by 8: JX v FTI Touristik GmbH (C-774/22); I. SA v S. J (C-410/23); QE and IJ v DP and EB (C-494/23); A1 and A2 v I (C-352/21); Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Mutua Madrileña Automovilista (C-536/23)2 provisions; Electricity & Water Authority of the Government of Bahrain and Others v Prysmian Netherlands BV and Others (C-672/23); WU v Directie van het Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen (CBR) (C-703/22); Syndicat Les Entreprises du Médicament (LEEM) v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé (C-20/22)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EU) No 1215/20122 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; DP and SG v Trapeza Peiraios AE (C-243/20); Saale Kareda v Stefan Benkö (C-249/16); Paweł Hofsoe v LVM Landwirtschaftlicher Versicherungsverein Münster AG (C-106/17); AAS „BALTA“ v UAB „GRIFS AG“ (C-803/18); CNP spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością v Gefion Insurance A/S (C-913/19); RH v AB Volvo and Others (C-30/20); FBTO Schadeverzekeringen NV v Jack Odenbreit (C-463/06); Société financière et industrielle du Peloux v Axa Belgium and Others (C-112/03); T.B. and D. sp. z. o. o. v G. I. A/S (C-393/20); Color Drack GmbH v Lexx International Vertriebs GmbH (C-386/05); Group Josi Reinsurance Company SA v Universal General Insurance Company (UGIC) (C-412/98); BT v Seguros Catalana Occidente and EB (C-708/20); A. B. and B. B. v Personal Exchange International Limited (C-774/19); Wilo Salmson France SAS v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti - Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi (C-80/20); DM and LR v Caisse régionale de Crédit agricole mutuel (CRCAM) - Alpes-Provence (C-337/20)