24As regards, moreover, the allegedly urgent character of the works to be performed under the public works contract at issue in the main proceedings, it should be noted that the requirement to deal rapidly with the dispute pending before the Court cannot derive solely from the fact that the referring court is required to ensure the rapid settlement of the dispute or from the mere fact that the delay or suspension of the works the subject of a public contract could have adverse effects on the persons concerned (see, to that effect, orders of the President of the Court of 18 July 2007, Commission v Poland, C‑193/07, not published, EU:C:2007:465, paragraph 13 and the case-law cited, and of 8 March 2018, Vitali, C‑63/18, not published, EU:C:2018:199, paragraph 19 and the case-law cited).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.