32For the purposes of that verification, the General Court, first, examined, in paragraphs 106 to 149 of the judgment under appeal, the evidence relating to the Commission’s internal language practice, namely:– Memorandum SEC(2000) 2071/6 from the President of the Commission of 29 November 2000 simplifying the Commission’s decision-making process and an extract from the minutes of the Commission’s 1502nd meeting of 29 November 2000, drawn up on 6 December 2000 (PV (2002) 1502) confirming the approval of that memorandum by the College of Commissioners;– the Rules of Procedure of the Commission (OJ 2000 L 308, p. 26), as amended by Commission Decision 2010/138/EU, Euratom of 24 February 2010 (OJ 2010 L 55, p. 60, ‘the Rules of Procedure of the Commission’) and the Rules giving effect to those rules of procedure (C (2010) 1200 final);– an extract from the Commission’s ‘Manual of Operating Procedures’, entitled ‘Language rules depending on adoption procedures’ and certain documents relating thereto; and– the annex to Commission communication SEC(2006) 1489 final of 20 December 2006 on translation in the Commission, entitled ‘Translation rules beyond 2006’ (‘Translation rules beyond 2006’).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.