29As is clear from the Court’s case‑law, neither the fact that a request for a preliminary ruling has been made in connection with proceedings for interim relief nor the fact that the referring court is required to do everything possible to ensure that the case in the main proceedings is resolved swiftly is in itself sufficient to justify the use of the expedited procedure under Article 105(1) of the Rules of Procedure (see, to that effect, orders of the President of the Court of 23 January 2007, Consel Gi. Emme, C‑467/06, not published, EU:C:2007:49, paragraph 7, and of 23 December 2015, Vilkas, C‑640/15, not published, EU:C:2015:862, paragraph 8 and the case-law cited).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.