Judgment_paragraph 70 · European Commission v Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, as heir of Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Maria Letizia Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, as heir of Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano (C-54/20 P)

70Thus, also according to settled case-law, that obligation requires the General Court to express in a clear and unequivocal manner the reasoning that it has followed, in a way that allows the interested parties to understand the justification for the decision taken and permits the Court of Justice to exercise its powers of review (see, to that effect, judgments of 26 July 2017, Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen v EUIPO, C‑471/16 P, not published, EU:C:2017:602, paragraph 28, and of 25 November 2020, Commission v GEA Group, C‑823/18 P, EU:C:2020:955, paragraph 89 and the case-law cited).