Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Jumbocarry Trading GmbH (C-39/20)
Consideration of the questions referred
38

Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Jumbocarry Trading GmbH (C-39/20)

Judgment of 3 Jun 2021law://eu/cjeu/2020/c-39-20/para_38@2026-11-12

38Therefore, it must be held that, at that date, Jumbocarry’s legal situation as regards the limitation of its customs debt had not become definitive, notwithstanding the fact that that debt has been incurred under the Community Customs Code.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-39/20 · ECLI:EU:C:2021:435
Decided: 3 Jun 2021
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands)
Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Defendant: Jumbocarry Trading GmbH
Rapporteur: M. Ilešič
Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona
Bench: 5 judges
E. Regan, M. Ilešič, E. Juhász, C. Lycourgos, I. Jarukaitis
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62020CJ0039

Topics

Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff Internal market - Principles

History · 1 version

3 Jun 2021Reading

Connections

Cited by 10: AB Volvo and DAF Trucks NV v RM (C-267/20); Trenitalia SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (C-510/23); Caronte & Tourist SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (C-511/23); Instituto Cervantes and Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-534/23); HG v European Commission (T-494/23)2 provisions; Prysmian Cabluri şi Sisteme SA v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Craiova – Direcţia Regională Vamală Craiova and Others (C-168/23); China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission (C-478/21 P); ZA and Others v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos SA (C-25/21); GM v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság and Others (C-159/21); Aurubis AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-271/20)
Cites 12: Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (recast); European Commission v Moravia Gas Storage a.s (C-596/13 P); Dermod Patrick O'Brien v Ministry of Justice (C-432/17); Belgische Staat v Molenbergnatie NV (C-201/04); Prequ' Italia Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli (C-276/16); Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Jumbocarry Trading GmbH (C-39/20); Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code; Staatssecretaris van Financiën v CEVA Freight Holland BV (C-249/18); Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446; Republic of Poland v European Commission (C-335/09 P); Federazione nazionale delle imprese elettrotecniche ed elettroniche (Anie) and Others and Athesia Energy Srl and Others v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA (C-798/18, C-799/18); Glencore Céréales France v Établissement national des produits de l'agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) (C-584/15)