Judgment_paragraph 39 · O.D. and Others v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (C-350/20)

39It follows that questions on the interpretation of EU law referred by a national court in the factual and legislative context which that court is responsible for defining, the accuracy of which is not a matter for the Court to determine, enjoy a presumption of relevance. The Court may refuse to rule on a question referred by a national court only where it is quite obvious that the interpretation of EU law that is sought bears no relation to the actual facts of the main action or its object, where the problem is hypothetical, or where the Court does not have before it the factual or legal material necessary to give a useful answer to the questions submitted to it (judgment of 13 November 2018, Čepelnik, C‑33/17, EU:C:2018:896, paragraph 21).

O.D. and Others v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (C-350/20)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections