Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
SIA „Visma Enterprise” v Konkurences padome (C-306/20)
The dispute in the main proceedings an…
38

SIA „Visma Enterprise” v Konkurences padome (C-306/20)

Judgment of 18 Nov 2021law://eu/cjeu/2020/c-306-20/para_38@2026-11-11

38Moreover, fundamentally different approaches to the definition of infringements of competition law may give rise to differences between the Member States which might hinder the functioning of the internal market.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Seventh Chamber
Case: C-306/20 · ECLI:EU:C:2021:935
Decided: 18 Nov 2021
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Regional Administrative Court, Latvia)
Applicant: SIA Visma Enterprise
Defendant: Konkurences padome
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: G. Pitruzzella
Bench: 3 judges
A. Arabadjiev, T. von Danwitz, A. Kumin
Language: Lithuanian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62020CJ0306

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

18 Nov 2021Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)
Cited by 10: Booking.com BV and Booking.com (Deutschland) GmbH v 25hours Hotel Company Berlin GmbH and Others (C-264/23); Association AFAÏA v Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO) (C-228/23)2 provisions; Autoridade da Concorrência and Others v Ministério Público (C-331/21); Lietuvos notarų rūmai and Others v Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba (C-128/21); UBS Group AG and Others v European Commission (T-441/21); ‘Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp’ AS and ‘KIA Auto’ AS v Konkurences padome (C-606/23); European Commission v Servier SAS and Others (C-176/19 P); European Commission v KRKA, tovarna zdravil, d.d (C-151/19); Em akaunt BG ЕООD v Zastrahovatelno aktsionerno druzhestvo Armeets AD (C-438/22); Super Bock Bebidas SA and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência (C-211/22)
Cites 15: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Massam Dzodzi v Belgian State (C-297/88, C-197/89); Generics (UK) Ltd and Others v Competition and Markets Authority (C-307/18); Gazdasági Versenyhivatal v Budapest Bank Nyrt. and Others (C-228/18); Proceedings brought by Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto (C-450/19); Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (Text with EEA relevance); Expedia Inc. v Autorité de la concurrence and Others (C-226/11); MasterCard Inc. and Others v European Commission (C-382/12 P); SIA „Maxima Latvija” v Konkurences padome (C-345/14); Allianz Hungária Biztosító Zrt. and Others v Gazdasági Versenyhivatal (C-32/11); SIA ‘VM Remonts’(formerly SIA ‘DIV un KO’) and Others v Konkurences padome (C-542/14); Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v D.-H. T. as liquidator of J & S Service UG (C-620/19); NV L'Oréal and SA L'Oréal v PVBA "De Nieuwe AMCK" (31/80); Metro SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (26/76); Société Technique Minière (L.T.M.) v Maschinenbau Ulm GmbH (M.B.U.) (56/65)