Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
OT v Vyriausioji tarnybinės etikos komisija (C-184/20)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
105

OT v Vyriausioji tarnybinės etikos komisija (C-184/20)

Judgment of 1 Aug 2022law://eu/cjeu/2020/c-184-20/para_105@2026-11-12

105Therefore, processing, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, of the personal data referred to in paragraph 100 of the present judgment must be regarded as constituting a serious interference with the fundamental rights of data subjects to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-184/20 · ECLI:EU:C:2022:601
Decided: 1 Aug 2022
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas (Regional Administrative Court, Vilnius, Lithuania)
Applicant: OT
Defendants: Vyriausioji tarnybinės etikos komisija; third party:; Fondas Nevyriausybinių organizacijų informacijos ir paramos centras
Rapporteur: M. Ilešič
Advocate General: P. Pikamäe
Bench: 13 judges
K. Lenaerts, L. Bay Larsen, A. Arabadjiev, A. Prechal, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, N. Jääskinen, I. Ziemele, J. Passer, M. Ilešič, J.‑C. Bonichot, A. Kumin, N. Wahl
Language: Lithuanian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62020CJ0184

Topics

Principles of Union law Protection of personal data

History · 1 version

1 Aug 2022Reading

Connections

Interprets 3: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation)4 provisions; Directive 95/46/EC; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions
Cited by 22: Meta Platforms Inc and Others v Bundeskartellamt (C-252/21); Criminal proceedings against V.S (C-205/21); UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-60/22); Agentsia po vpisvaniyata v OL (C-200/23); Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium v Minister des Hessischen Kultusministeriums (C-34/21); TU and RE v Google LLC (C-460/20); ND v DR (C-21/23)2 provisions; European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-204/21); TB v Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. and 'Knor' Sp. z o.o (C-628/21); X v Russmedia Digital SRL and Inform Media Press SRL (C-492/23); WM and Sovim SA v Luxembourg Business Registers (C-37/20)2 provisions; Robert Roos and Others v European Parliament (C-458/22); Proximus NV v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit (C-129/21); CL v Prokuratura na Republika Bulgaria (C-312/24); Lagardère SA v European Commission (T-1119/23); Vivendi SE v European Commission (T-1097/23); DADA Music SRL and Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) v Asociaţia Radiourilor Locale şi Regionale (ARLR) (C-37/24); Syndyk Masy Upadłości A v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu (C-709/22); Gesamtverband Autoteile-Handel e.V. v Scania CV AB (C-319/22); Quadrant Amroq Beverages SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili (C-332/21); Maxime Picard v European Commission (C-366/21 P); O.T. E. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-66/21)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation); Directive 95/46/EC; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González (C-131/12); Criminal proceedings against Bodil Lindqvist (C-101/01); Proceedings brought by B (C-439/19); G.D. v The Commissioner of the Garda Síochána and Others (C-140/20); Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU (Opinion 1/15); SIA 'SS' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (C-175/20); GC and Others v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) (C-136/17); Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Lecce v Salvatore Manni (C-398/15); Weltimmo s.r.o. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (C-230/14); Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd and Others v Staatssecretaris van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (C-160/20); TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA (C-708/18); Bank Melli Iran v Telekom Deutschland GmbH (C-124/20); Google LLC, successor in law to Google Inc. v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) (C-507/17); 2008/801/EC: Council Decision of 25 September 2008 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the United Nations Convention against Corruption; Dixons Retail plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (C-494/12); Ourdia Djabali v Caisse d'allocations familiales de l'Essonne (C-314/96); Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil) v M.M. and Others (C-67/20)