Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
SIA 'SS' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (C-175/20)
Consideration of the questions referred
The third to ninth questions
64

SIA 'SS' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (C-175/20)

Judgment of 24 Feb 2022law://eu/cjeu/2020/c-175-20/para_64@2026-11-11

64First of all, the requirement that the purposes of the processing be specified implies, as can be seen from recital 39 of that regulation, that those purposes must be identified, at the latest, at the time of the collection of the personal data.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-175/20 · ECLI:EU:C:2022:124
Decided: 24 Feb 2022
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Regional Administrative Court, Latvia)
Applicant: ‘SS’ SIA
Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
Rapporteur: M. Ilešič
Advocate General: M. Bobek
Bench: 5 judges
E. Regan, K. Lenaerts, C. Lycourgos, I. Jarukaitis, M. Ilešič
Language: Latvian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62020CJ0175

Topics

Principles of Union law Protection of personal data

History · 1 version

24 Feb 2022Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation)2 provisions
Cited by 14: Meta Platforms Inc and Others v Bundeskartellamt (C-252/21); F.F. v Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and CRIF GmbH (C-487/21); Nacionalinis visuomenės sveikatos centras prie Sveikatos apsaugos ministerijos v Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija (C-683/21); UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-60/22); OT v Vyriausioji tarnybinės etikos komisija (C-184/20); Meta Platforms Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V (C-757/22)2 provisions; Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium v Minister des Hessischen Kultusministeriums (C-34/21); Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (C-77/21)2 provisions; VS v Inspektor v Inspektorata kam Visshia sadeben savet (C-180/21); RK v Ministerstvo zdravotnictví (C-659/22); C.G. v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Landeck (C-548/21); Maximilian Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (C-446/21); Endemol Shine Finland Oy (C-740/22); Leon Leonard Johan Veen v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (T-436/21)
Cites 10: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Directive (EU) 2016/680; La Quadrature du Net and Others v Premier ministre and Others (C-511/18, C-512/18, C-520/18); Proceedings brought by B (C-439/19); Criminal proceedings against H. K (C-746/18); Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems (C-311/18); Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy (C-73/16); Privacy International v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Others (C-623/17)