Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Tazzetti SpA and Tazzetti, SA v European Commission (T-825/19)
IV. Law…
A. The actions against the second lett…
1. Substance
(b)The pleas of illegality
155

Tazzetti SpA and Tazzetti, SA v European Commission (T-825/19)

law://eu/cjeu/2019/t-825-19/para_155@2026-11-14

Key facts

Court: General Court · First Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-825/19 · ECLI:EU:T:2023:148
Decided: 22 Mar 2023
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Tazzetti SpA; Tazzetti SA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: Kanninen
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019TJ0825

Topics

History · 1 version

22 Mar 2023Reading

Connections

Cited by 4: Carmeuse Holding SRL v European Commission (T-554/22); Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-599/22); Volkskreditbank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-406/22); Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-395/22)2 provisions
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001; Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013; Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 (ECB/2014/17); Silvio Berlusconi and Finanziaria d'investimento Fininvest SpA (Fininvest) v Banca d'Italia and Istituto per la Vigilanza Sulle Assicurazioni (IVASS) (C-219/17); European Commission v Éditions Odile Jacob SAS (C-404/10 P); European Commission v EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (C-365/12 P); Organización de Consumidores y Usuarios (OCU) v European Central Bank (T-15/18); ClientEarth and The International Chemical Secretariat v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (T-245/11); Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 Text with EEA relevance; Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV v European Commission (C-362/08); Systema Teknolotzis AE - Efarmogon Ilektronikis kai Pliroforikis v European Commission (T-234/15); KF v European Union Satellite Centre (SATCEN) (T-286/15); Alfonsius Alferink and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-94/98); Iccrea Banca SpA Istituto Centrale del Credito Cooperativo v Banca d'Italia (C-414/18); Groupe Gascogne SA v European Commission (C-58/12 P); Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union (T-348/14); Nader Kalai v Council of the European Union (T-178/19)

Judgment of 22 Mar 2023

155It is apparent from Implementing Regulation 2019/661 that it is based on Article 17(2) of Regulation No 517/2014, according to which the Commission may, to the extent necessary, by means of implementing acts, ensure the smooth functioning of the HFC registry. That provision, consequently, applies Article 291(2) TFEU. Accordingly, the implementing power conferred on the Commission is delimited by both Article 291(2) TFEU and Article 17(2) of Regulation No 517/2014.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.