Judgment_paragraph 98 · Interpipe Niko Tube OOO and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant PAO v European Commission (T-716/19)

98It follows that the provisions of the basic regulation, inasmuch as they correspond to the provisions of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement, must be interpreted, as far as possible, in the light of the corresponding provisions of that agreement, as interpreted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (see, to that effect, judgments of 19 December 2013, Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ and ENRC Marketing v Council, C‑10/12 P, not published, EU:C:2013:865, paragraph 54; of 18 October 2018, Rotho Blaas, C‑207/17, EU:C:2018:840, paragraphs 46 to 48; and of 10 April 2019, Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission, T‑301/16, EU:T:2019:234, paragraph 134).

Interpipe Niko Tube OOO and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant PAO v European Commission (T-716/19)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections