574Accordingly, the Commission cannot be criticised for having invoked repeated infringement in the present case in view of the lapse of time between the initial infringement or infringements established and the infringement penalised in the contested decision. That is what demonstrates the undertaking’s tendency to infringe the competition rules and therefore justifies the intention to direct its conduct towards compliance with those rules (see, to that effect, judgments of 25 October 2005, Groupe Danone v Commission, T‑38/02, EU:T:2005:367, paragraph 354, and of 13 December 2012, Versalis and Eni v Commission, T‑103/08, not published, EU:T:2012:686, paragraph 266).