Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission (T-657/19)
III. Law
C. Third plea in law, alleging failure…
3. Third complaint, concerning the ove…
218

Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission (T-657/19)

law://eu/cjeu/2019/t-657-19/para_218@2026-11-13

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fourth Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-657/19 · ECLI:EU:T:2022:691
Decided: 9 Nov 2022
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Feralpi Holding SpA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: Nihoul
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019TJ0657

Topics

History · 1 version

9 Nov 2022Reading

Connections

Cited by 1: Brasserie Nationale (anc. Brasseries Funck-Bricher et Bofferding) and Munhowen SA v European Commission (T-289/24)
Cites 2: Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P)2 provisions; Solvay SA v European Commission (C-109/10 P)

Judgment of 9 Nov 2022

218In that regard, it must be observed that the duty to act within a reasonable time applies to each stage of a procedure and to the procedure taken as a whole (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 October 2002, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission, C‑238/99 P, C‑244/99 P, C‑245/99 P, C‑247/99 P, C‑250/99 P to C‑252/99 P and C‑254/99 P, EU:C:2002:582, paragraphs 230 and 231, and Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Solvay v Commission, C‑109/10 P, EU:C:2011:256, point 239).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.