Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Valsabbia Investimenti SpA v European Commission (T-655/19)
Law
The fourth plea in law, alleging infri…
The first complaint, concerning the in…
229

Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Valsabbia Investimenti SpA v European Commission (T-655/19)

Judgment of 9 Nov 2022law://eu/cjeu/2019/t-655-19/para_229@2026-11-11

229However, the existence of that power does not exempt the Commission from its duty to state reasons (see, to that effect, judgment of 12 March 2020, LL-Carpenter v Commission, T‑531/18, not published, EU:T:2020:91, paragraph 90 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fourth Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-655/19 · ECLI:EU:T:2022:689
Decided: 9 Nov 2022
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Ferriera Valsabbia SpA; Valsabbia Investimenti SpA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: Nihoul
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019TJ0655

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

9 Nov 2022Reading

Connections

Cited by 1: Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Others v European Commission (C-29/23)
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); Italmobiliare SpA and Others v European Commission (T-523/15); LL-Carpenter s. r. o. v European Commission (T-531/18); Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission (C-85/15 P); Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Others v European Commission (C-86/15 P, C-87/15 P); Commission of the European Communities v AssiDomän Kraft Products AB, Iggesunds Bruk AB, Korsnäs AB, MoDo Paper AB, Södra Cell AB, Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB and Svenska Cellulosa AB (C-310/97 P); Kendrion NV v European Commission (C-50/12 P); Silver Plastics GmbH & Co. KG and Johannes Reifenhäuser Holding GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (T-582/15); H v Council of the European Union (T-271/10 R); Flavia Angeletti v European Commission (T-394/03); Ziegler SA v European Commission (C-439/11 P); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-267/07); Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais and Communauté d’agglomération du Douaisis v European Commission (T-267/08, T-279/08); Solvay SA v European Commission (C-109/10 P); Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Der Grüne Punkt - Duales System Deutschland GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-385/07)