Judgment_paragraph 77 · Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Antoni Comín i Oliveres v European Parliament (T-388/19)

77Finally, it should be noted that the condition relating to the existence of a challengeable act is among those that constitute an absolute bar to proceeding with a case which the Court may raise, where applicable, of its own motion (see, to that effect, orders of 14 January 1992, ISAE/VP and Interdata v Commission, C‑130/91, EU:C:1992:7, paragraph 11, and of 19 October 2016, E-Control v ACER, T‑671/15, not published, EU:T:2016:626, paragraph 91; Opinions of Advocate General Bot in Commission v Ireland and Others, C‑89/08 P, EU:C:2009:298, point 62, and in BSH v OHIM, C‑43/15 P, EU:C:2016:129, point 52).

Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Antoni Comín i Oliveres v European Parliament (T-388/19)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version