Uzina Metalurgica Moldoveneasca OAO v European Commission (T-245/19)

Judgment of 18 May 2022

law://eu/cjeu/2019/t-245-19/para_45@2026-11-13

45Lastly, it must be recalled, first, that the condition relating to the absence of implementing measures should not be confused with the requirement that a contested act be of direct concern to the applicant (see, to that effect, order of 4 December 2013, Forgital Italy v Council, T‑438/10, not published, EU:T:2013:648, paragraph 54) and, second, that, in the analysis of the applicant’s direct concern, the mere existence of implementing measures is not sufficient to preclude such concern, since the relevant legal criterion is that absence of any discretion left to the addressees of the act at issue, who are entrusted with the task of implementing it (see, to that effect, order of 14 January 2015, Solar World and Others v Commission, T‑507/13, EU:T:2015:23, paragraph 40).

Uzina Metalurgica Moldoveneasca OAO v European Commission (T-245/19)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections