Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
M.A. v Konsul Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w N (C-949/19)
Consideration of the question referred
42

M.A. v Konsul Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w N (C-949/19)

Judgment of 10 Mar 2021law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-949-19/para_42@2026-11-12

42Thus, as in the case of Schengen visas, the EU legislature has left to the Member States the task of deciding on the nature and specific conditions of the remedies available to applicants for long-term visas covered by Directive 2016/801.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-949/19 · ECLI:EU:C:2021:186
Decided: 10 Mar 2021
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Supreme Administrative Court, Poland)
Applicant: M.A.
Defendant: Konsul Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w N.
Rapporteur: R. Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General: J. Richard de la Tour
Bench: 5 judges
J.-C. Bonichot, R. Silva de Lapuerta, L. Bay Larsen, C. Toader, M. Safjan
Language: Polish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0949

Topics

Approximation of laws Charter of Fundamental Rights Immigration policy Judicial cooperation in criminal matters Principles of Union law Public health

History · 1 version

10 Mar 2021Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Directive (EU) 2016/801
Cited by 6: Randstad Italia SpA v Umana SpA and Others (C-497/20); Volkswagen Group Italia SpA and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (C-27/22); Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone de Belgique and Others v État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration (C-299/23)2 provisions; XXX v État belge (C-14/23); Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v S.S. and Others (C-338/21); FN and Others v Übernahmekommission (C-546/18)
Cites 9: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); A. K. and Others v Sąd Najwyższy, CP v Sąd Najwyższy and DO v Sąd Najwyższy (C-585/18, C-624/18, C-625/18); Soufiane El Hassani v Minister Spraw Zagranicznych (C-403/16); Directive (EU) 2016/801; Ville d’Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve and Others v Région wallonne (C-225/13); X and X v État belge (C-638/16 PPU); Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code)