Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
LH v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-921/19)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
38

LH v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-921/19)

Judgment of 10 Jun 2021law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-921-19/para_38@2026-11-12

38Consequently, although those two conditions for admissibility must both be satisfied in order for the examination of a subsequent application to continue, in accordance with Article 40(3) of that directive, the fact remains that they are distinct and must not be conflated.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-921/19 · ECLI:EU:C:2021:478
Decided: 10 Jun 2021
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats’s-Hertogenbosch (District Court, The Hague, sitting in ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands)
Applicant: LH
Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid
Rapporteur: L.S. Rossi
Advocate General: G. Hogan
Bench: 5 judges
A. Prechal, N. Wahl, F. Biltgen, L.S. Rossi, J. Passer
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0921

Topics

Asylum policy Border checks

History · 1 version

10 Jun 2021Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast); Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast)
Cited by 4: K and L v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-646/21); SN and LN v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite (C-563/22); A. A. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-216/22)2 provisions; XY (C-18/20)
Cites 6: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast); K.S. and M.H.K. v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others and R.A.T. and D.S. v Minister for Justice and Equality (C-322/19, C-385/19); LH v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-921/19); Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast); Ministerio Fiscal v VL (C-36/20 PPU)