Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd (C-891/19 P)
The appeal
The first to third grounds of appeal
Findings of the Court
–Preliminary observations
75

European Commission v Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd (C-891/19 P)

Judgment of 20 Jan 2022law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-891-19/para_75@2026-11-11

75Accordingly, the basic regulation does not, in principle, impose any obligation on the Commission to carry out an analysis of the existence of price undercutting at a level other than that of the like product.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-891/19 P · ECLI:EU:C:2022:38
Decided: 20 Jan 2022
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62017TJ0500
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd
Rapporteur: A. Prechal
Advocate General: G. Pitruzzella
Bench: 5 judges
A. Prechal, J. Passer, F. Biltgen, L.S. Rossi, N. Wahl
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0891

Topics

History · 1 version

20 Jan 2022Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-500/17)
Cited by 21: Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAŞ and Others v European Commission (C-499/24 P); PT Musim Mas v European Commission (T-176/23); LG Chem, Ltd. v European Commission (T-356/22); Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics SAE and Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE v European Commission (C-269/23 P); PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo v European Commission (C-112/23 P); China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (CCCME) and Others v European Commission (T-263/22)2 provisions; Vyatsky Plywood Mill OOO v European Commission (T-32/22); Zheshartsky LPK OOO (ZHLPK) v European Commission (T-3/22); Sveza Verkhnyaya Sinyachikha NAO and Others v European Commission (T-2/22); Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAŞ and Others v European Commission (T-629/21); Çolakoğlu Metalurji AŞ and Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret AŞ v European Commission (T-630/21); Columbus Stainless (Pty) Ltd v European Commission (T-445/22); Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Ltd v European Commission (C-688/22); Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical Co. Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-762/20)4 provisions; Anhui Wanwei Updated High-Tech Material Industry Co. Ltd and Inner Mongolia Mengwei Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-764/20); Inner Mongolia Shuangxin Environment-Friendly Material Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-763/20); Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-123/21 P); China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission (C-478/21 P); SMA Mineral AB v European Commission (T-215/21); AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK 'Azot' v European Commission (T-126/21); Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-326/21)
Cites 15: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); European Commission v Hungary (C-66/18); Bricmate AB v Tullverket (C-569/13); Regulation (EU) 2016/1036; Caviro Distillerie Srl and Others v European Commission (C-345/18); Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd v Council of the European Union (C-100/17 P); Fliesen-Zentrum Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Regensburg (C-687/13); European Commission v Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd (C-891/19); Changshu City Standard Parts Factory and Ningbo Jinding Fastener Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (C-376/15 P, C-377/15 P); Shanghai Teraoka Electronic Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-35/01); Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-500/17); X v Inspecteur van de Belastingsdienst / Y and X BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst P (C-319/10); Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1977; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/804 of 11 May 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron (other than cast iron) or steel (other than stainless steel), of circular cross-section, of an external diameter exceeding 406,4 mm, originating in the People's Republic of China; Petrotub SA and Republica SA v Council of the European Union (C-76/00 P)