Judgment_paragraph 27 · Beeren-, Wild-, Feinfrucht GmbH v Hauptzollamt Erfurt (C-825/19)

27The fact nevertheless remains that the Court may, at any time after hearing the Advocate General, order the opening or reopening of the oral part of the procedure, in accordance with Article 83 of its Rules of Procedure, in particular if it considers that it lacks sufficient information (see, to that effect, judgment of 9 June 2016, Pesce and Others, C‑78/16 and C‑79/16, EU:C:2016:428, paragraph 27).

Beeren-, Wild-, Feinfrucht GmbH v Hauptzollamt Erfurt (C-825/19)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections