Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission (C-650/19 P)
The action before the General Court
139

Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission (C-650/19 P)

law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-650-19/para_139@2026-11-13

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-650/19 P · ECLI:EU:C:2021:879
Decided: 28 Oct 2021
Procedure: Appeal
Ruled invalid: 62017TJ0617
Applicant: Vialto Consulting Kft
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: G. Hogan
Bench: 3 judges
K. Lenaerts, L. Bay Larsen, J.-C. Bonichot
Language: Greek
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0650

Topics

Law governing the institutions

History · 1 version

28 Oct 2021Reading

Judgment of 28 Oct 2021

139In the present case, the proceedings are in a state where judgment can be given in so far as concerns the first of those conditions, relating to the Commission’s conduct.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Interprets 1: Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission (T-617/17)
Cited by 19: Mainova AG and enercity AG v European Commission (C-178/24); Renco Valore SpA and Others v European Commission (C-806/23); Bourbon Offshore Interoil Shipping - Navegação, Lda v European Commission (C-803/23); Sonasurf Internacional - Shipping, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission (C-9/24); EVH GmbH and Others v European Commission (C-464/23); Região Autónoma da Madeira v European Commission (C-547/23); Thomas Bindl v European Commission (T-354/22); Portuguese Republic v European Commission (C-736/22); Symphony Environmental Technologies plc and Symphony Environmental Ltd v European Parliament and Others (T-745/20); United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission (C-297/22 P); XC v European Commission (C-527/21); Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pesaro and Others v European Commission (C-549/21); Harley-Davidson Europe Ltd and Neovia Logistics Services International v European Commission (T-324/21); SJ AB v European Commission (T-659/20); Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission (T-537/18); Health Information Management (HIM) v European Commission (C-500/21); International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission (C-619/20 P)2 provisions; Illumina, Inc. v European Commission (T-227/21); Creaticon d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-93/21)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Safa Nicu Sepahan Co. v Council of the European Union (C-45/15 P); John Dalli v European Commission (C-615/19 P); Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013; OZ v European Investment Bank (C-558/17 P); Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission (C-606/18 P); Tulliallan Burlington Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-155/18 P, C-156/18 P, C-157/18 P, C-158/18 P); European Commission v Printeos, SA (C-301/19 P); European Union Satellite Centre v KF (C-14/19 P); European External Action Service (EEAS) v Stéphane De Loecker (C-187/19 P); Solvay SA v European Commission (C-110/10 P); Commission Regulation (EC) No 718/2007; Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities; Ismeri Europa Srl v Court of Auditors of the European Communities (C-315/99 P); 1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom: Commission Decision of 28 April 1999 establishing the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) (notified under document number SEC(1999) 802); Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE v European Commission and Others (C-520/12); Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission (T-617/17); Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission (C-650/19); Jean-Charles Marchiani v European Parliament (C-566/14 P)