Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Criminal proceedings against IS (C-564/19)
Consideration of the questions referred
The fifth question
Substance
93

Criminal proceedings against IS (C-564/19)

Judgment of 23 Nov 2021law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-564-19/para_93@2026-11-11

93In the light of the foregoing, the answer to the fifth question is that Article 267 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding disciplinary proceedings from being brought against a national judge on the ground that he or she has made a reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under that provision.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-564/19 · ECLI:EU:C:2021:949
Decided: 23 Nov 2021
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Pesti Központi Kerületi Bíróság (Central District Court, Pest, Hungary)
Rapporteur: I. Jarukaitis
Advocate General: P. Pikamäe
Bench: 11 judges
K. Lenaerts, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, E. Regan, S. Rodin, I. Jarukaitis, J.‑C. Bonichot, P.G. Xuereb, N. Piçarra, L.S. Rossi, A. Kumin
Language: Hungarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0564

Topics

Approximation of laws Area of freedom, security and justice Charter of Fundamental Rights Justice and home affairs

History · 1 version

23 Nov 2021Reading

Connections

Interprets 4: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings; Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings
Cited by 20: Agentsia po vpisvaniyata v OL (C-200/23); Criminal proceedings against PM and Others (C-357/19)2 provisions; Proceedings brought by RS (C-430/21); Admiral Gaming Network Srl and Others v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli and Others (C-475/20); Nederlandse Voedsel- en Warenautoriteit and Others v Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd (C-155/24); « Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata (C-260/24); Cairo Network Srl and Others v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy and Others (C-764/23); Royal Football Club Seraing v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Others (C-600/23); E.M.A. and Others (C-395/23); UN v État belge (C-380/23); Landkreis Jerichower Land v A (C-85/23); Criminal proceedings against Politseyski organ pri 02 RU SDVR (C-608/21); RH v European Commission (T-175/21); Criminal proceedings against DELTA STROY 2003 (C-203/21); Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia and Others v YF and Others (C-301/21); Criminal proceedings against HV (C-266/21); Criminal proceedings against HN (C-420/20); Criminal proceedings against TL (C-242/22 PPU); Coca-Cola European Partners Deutschland GmbH v L.B. and R.G (C-257/21); Criminal procedure against IR (C-569/20)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Criminal proceedings against AZ (C-510/19); Miasto Łowicz v Skarb Państwa – Wojewoda Łódzki and Prokurator Generalny v VX and Others (C-558/18, C-563/18); Asociaţia 'Forumul Judecătorilor din România' and Others v Inspecţia Judiciară and Others (C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19, C-397/19); Criminal proceedings against Atanas Ognyanov (C-614/14); CARTESIO Oktató és Szolgáltató bt (C-210/06); Aziz Melki and Sélim Abdeli (C-188/10, C-189/10); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-791/19); A.B. and Others v Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa and Others (C-824/18); UX v Governo della Repubblica italiana (C-658/18); Andrejs Surmačs v Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija (C-127/14); Criminal procedure against Massimo Gambino and Shpetim Hyka (C-38/18); Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings; Criminal proceedings against Gavril Covaci (C-216/14); David Smith v Patrick Meade and Others (C-122/17); Artur Weryński v Mediatel 4B spółka z o.o. (C-283/09); DHL Express (Austria) GmbH v Post-Control-Kommission and Bundesminister für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie (C-2/15); Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings; Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings