Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
M.F. v J.M (C-508/19)
Procedure before the Court
The application for an expedited proce…
37

M.F. v J.M (C-508/19)

Judgment of 22 Mar 2022law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-508-19/para_37@2026-11-11

37It must be borne in mind that such an expedited procedure is a procedural instrument intending to address matters of an exceptional urgency (judgment of 21 December 2021, Randstad Italia, C‑497/20, EU:C:2021:1037, paragraph 37 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-508/19 · ECLI:EU:C:2022:201
Decided: 22 Mar 2022
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych) (Supreme Court (Labour and Social Insurance Chamber), Poland)
Applicant: M.F.
Defendant: J.M.
Interveners: Prokurator Generalny; Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich
Rapporteur: A. Prechal
Advocate General: E. Tanchev
Bench: 11 judges
K. Lenaerts, L. Bay Larsen, A. Prechal, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, E. Regan, S. Rodin, N. Jääskinen, M. Ilešič, F. Biltgen, A. Kumin
Language: Polish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0508

Topics

Charter of Fundamental Rights Principles of Union law

History · 1 version

22 Mar 2022Reading

Connections

Cited by 13: European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-204/21)2 provisions; Criminal proceedings against CU and ND (C-112/22); G. and Others v M.S. and X (C-181/21); Criminal proceedings against G. ST. T (C-655/21); Port de Bruxelles and Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v Infrabel SA (C-229/21)2 provisions; Financijska agencija v Hann-Invest d.o.o. and Others (C-554/21); MJ v AA (C-521/21); 'R' S.A. v AW 'T” sp. z o.o.' (C-225/22); Criminal proceedings against YR and Others (C-16/24); Kolin Inşaat Turizm Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ v Državna komisija za kontrolu postupaka javne nabave (C-652/22); Virgilijus Valančius v Lietuvos Republikos Vyriausybė (C-119/23); CCC v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) and Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) (C-673/22); Criminal proceedings against YP and Others (C-615/20)3 provisions
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; A. K. and Others v Sąd Najwyższy, CP v Sąd Najwyższy and DO v Sąd Najwyższy (C-585/18, C-624/18, C-625/18); Proceedings brought by W.Ż (C-487/19); Miasto Łowicz v Skarb Państwa – Wojewoda Łódzki and Prokurator Generalny v VX and Others (C-558/18, C-563/18); Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL v Jean-Marc Bosman, Royal club liégeois SA v Jean-Marc Bosman and others and Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v Jean-Marc Bosman (C-415/93); Randstad Italia SpA v Umana SpA and Others (C-497/20)2 provisions; Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru (C-896/19); Criminal proceedings against WB and Others (C-748/19); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-791/19); A.B. and Others v Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa and Others (C-824/18); Servet Kamberaj v Istituto per l’Edilizia Sociale della Provincia autonoma di Bolzano (IPES) and Others (C-571/10); Slowakische Republik v Achmea BV (C-284/16); Pasquale Foglia v Mariella Novello (104/79); Gabriele Di Girolamo v Ministero della Giustizia (C-472/17); Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru (C-896/19)