Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-475/19 P, C-688/19 P)
The appeals
Substance
The second and third grounds of appeal…
–Assessment of the Court
70

Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-475/19 P, C-688/19 P)

Judgment of 17 Dec 2020law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-475-19/para_70@2026-11-11

70It follows that a Member State may impose specific rules concerning the installation and use of ‘construction products’, provided that they do not include requirements diverging from the harmonised standards as regards the evaluation or CE marking of such products.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Cases: C-475/19 P, C-688/19 P · ECLI:EU:C:2020:1036
Decided: 17 Dec 2020
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: C. Toader
Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona
Bench: 5 judges
J.C. Bonichot, L. Bay Larsen, C. Toader, M. Safjan, N. Jääskinen
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0475

Topics

Approximation of laws

History · 1 version

17 Dec 2020Reading

Connections

Cited by 6: Obshtina Pleven v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa 'Regioni v rastezh' 2014-2020 (C-513/23); Compagnie industrielle de la matière végétale (CIMV) v European Commission (C-366/23); Patrick Breyer v European Research Executive Agency (REA) (C-135/22 P); Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. v European Commission (C-163/22); DIMCO Dimovasili M.I.K.E. v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias (C-499/20)2 provisions; this act7 provisions
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations; Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012; Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC Text with EEA relevance; Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-53/18); Commission Decision (EU) 2017/145; Commission Decision (EU) 2017/133; Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1995; Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1996; Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-229/17); Iceland Foods Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-162/19); James Elliott Construction Limited v Irish Asphalt Limited (C-613/14)