Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Pometon SpA v European Commission (C-440/19 P)
The appeal
The first ground of appeal
Findings of the Court
–Substance
60

Pometon SpA v European Commission (C-440/19 P)

Judgment of 18 Mar 2021law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-440-19/para_60@2026-11-12

60The presumption of innocence constitutes a general principle of EU law, laid down in Article 48(1) of the Charter (judgment of 22 November 2012, E.ON Energie v Commission, C‑89/11 P, EU:C:2012:738, paragraph 72).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-440/19 P · ECLI:EU:C:2021:214
Decided: 18 Mar 2021
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62016TJ0433
Applicant: Pometon SpA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: Jürimäe
Advocate General: G. Hogan
Bench: 5 judges
M. Vilaras, N. Piçarra, D. Šváby, S. Rodin, K. Jürimäe (Rapporteure)
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0440

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

18 Mar 2021Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Pometon SpA v European Commission (T-433/16)
Cited by 18: Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Others v European Commission (C-380/22 P); Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission (C-379/22 P); British Airways plc v European Commission (C-378/22 P); Air France-KLM v European Commission (C-370/22 P); SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (C-403/22 P); Société Air France SA v European Commission (C-369/22 P); Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission (C-401/22 P)3 provisions; Martinair Holland NV v European Commission (C-386/22 P); Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission (C-385/22 P); Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission (C-382/22 P); Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-381/22 P); Lantmännen ek för and Lantmännen Biorefineries AB v European Commission (T-93/24)6 provisions; UBS Group AG and Others v European Commission (T-441/21); Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Commission (T-386/21); Servier SAS and Others v European Commission (C-201/19 P); Altice Group Lux Sàrl v European Commission (C-746/21 P); DI v European Central Bank (C-513/21 P); PV v European Commission (C-640/20 P)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Guardian Industries Corp. and Guardian Europe Sàrl v European Commission (C-580/12 P); Icap plc and Others v European Commission (T-180/15); HK v European Commission (C-460/18 P); Ziegler SA v European Commission (C-439/11 P); E.ON Energie AG v European Commission (C-89/11 P)2 provisions; Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Timab Industries and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) v European Commission (C-411/15 P); Criminal proceedings against AH and Others (C-377/18); Galp Energía España SA and Others v European Commission (C-603/13 P); Bundesverband der Arzneimittel-Importeure eV and Commission of the European Communities v Bayer AG (C-2/01 P, C-3/01 P); European Commission v Keramag Keramische Werke GmbH and Others (C-613/13 P); Orange Polska SA v European Commission (C-123/16 P); BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-43/15 P); European Commission v Verhuizingen Coppens NV (C-441/11 P); Hüls AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-199/92 P); European Commission v Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Srl and Parker-Hannifin Corp (C-434/13 P); Pometon SpA v European Commission (T-433/16); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P)