Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Proceedings brought by B (C-439/19)
Consideration of the questions referred
Second question
121

Proceedings brought by B (C-439/19)

Judgment of 22 Jun 2021law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-439-19/para_121@2026-11-12

121Furthermore, for the same reason, the right to freedom of information referred to in Article 85 of the GDPR cannot be interpreted as justifying the disclosure to any person who so requests of personal data relating to penalty points imposed for road traffic offences.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-439/19 · ECLI:EU:C:2021:504
Decided: 22 Jun 2021
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Latvijas Republikas Satversmes tiesa (Constitutional Court, Latvia)
Applicant: B
Other party: Latvijas Republikas Saeima
Rapporteur: M. Ilešič
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 15 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.‑C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, E. Regan, M. Ilešič, N. Piçarra, E. Juhász, M. Safjan, D. Šváby, S. Rodin, F. Biltgen, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, P.G. Xuereb
Language: Latvian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0439

Topics

Approximation of laws Principles of Union law Protection of personal data

History · 1 version

22 Jun 2021Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation)4 provisions
Cited by 24: UI v Österreichische Post AG (C-300/21); Meta Platforms Inc and Others v Bundeskartellamt (C-252/21); UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-60/22); NG v Direktor na Glavna direktsia ‘Natsionalna politsia’ pri Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti – Sofia (C-118/22); Agentsia po vpisvaniyata v OL (C-200/23); Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium v Minister des Hessischen Kultusministeriums (C-34/21); Mousse v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) and SNCF Connect (C-394/23); VS v Inspektor v Inspektorata kam Visshia sadeben savet (C-180/21); RK v Ministerstvo zdravotnictví (C-659/22); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-204/21); Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde v WK (C-33/22); Norra Stockholm Bygg AB v Per Nycander AB (C-268/21); Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet (C-313/23); Maximilian Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (C-446/21); Endemol Shine Finland Oy (C-740/22)2 provisions; Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP) (C-654/23); ,,Nekilnojamojo turto valdymas“ BUAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (C-544/24); European Commission v Hungary (C-769/22); DB InfraGO AG and DB RegioNetz Infrastruktur GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-770/24); T.T. and BAJI Trans, s.r. o. v Národný inšpektorát práce (C-544/23); 'Vinal' AD v Direktor na Agentsia 'Mitnitsi' (C-820/21); T.A.C. v Agenția Națională de Integritate (ANI) (C-40/21); MV - 98 v Nachalnik na otdel & (C-97/21); Dual Prod SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca - Comisia regională pentru autorizarea operatorilor de produse supuse accizelor armonizate (C-412/21)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation)2 provisions; Directive 95/46/EC; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Directive (EU) 2016/680; Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information; Criminal proceedings against Bodil Lindqvist (C-101/01); Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems (C-311/18); Volker und Markus Schecke GbR and Hartmut Eifert v Land Hessen (C-92/09, C-93/09); GC and Others v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) (C-136/17); Proceedings brought by Tietosuojavaltuutettu (C-25/17); Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy (C-73/16); Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Planet49 GmbH (C-673/17); Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Lecce v Salvatore Manni (C-398/15); TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA (C-708/18); VQ v Land Hessen (C-272/19); Deutsche Post AG v Hauptzollamt Köln (C-496/17); Emeka Nelson and Others v Deutsche Lufthansa AG and TUI Travel plc and Others v Civil Aviation Authority (C-581/10, C-629/10); Stefano Melloni v Ministerio Fiscal (C-399/11); Łukasz Marcin Bonda (C-489/10); Wienand Meilicke, Heidi Christa Weyde and Marina Stöffler v Finanzamt Bonn-Innenstadt (C-292/04)