Judgment_paragraph 31 · Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. and Inpost S.A. v European Commission (C-431/19 P, C-432/19 P)

31According to settled case-law, it follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an appeal must indicate precisely the contested elements of the judgment which the appellant seeks to have set aside and also the legal arguments specifically advanced in support of the appeal. An appeal that does not have such characteristics cannot be the subject of a legal assessment which would allow the Court to exercise its function in the area under examination and to carry out its review of legality (judgment of 1 February 2018, Panalpina World Transport (Holding) and Others v Commission, C‑271/16 P, not published, EU:C:2018:59, paragraph 17 and the case-law cited).