Judgment_paragraph 108 · Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. and Inpost S.A. v European Commission (C-431/19 P, C-432/19 P)

108The Court has already held that arguments in an appeal which criticise the decision whose annulment was applied for before the General Court, rather than the judgment delivered by the General Court following that application for annulment, are manifestly inadmissible (order of 27 September 2012, Brighton Collectibles v OHIM, C‑624/11 P, not published, EU:C:2012:598, paragraph 35).

Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. and Inpost S.A. v European Commission (C-431/19 P, C-432/19 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections