Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Proceedings relating to the extradition of BY (C-398/19)
Consideration of the questions referred
The second question
41

Proceedings relating to the extradition of BY (C-398/19)

Judgment of 17 Dec 2020law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-398-19/para_41@2026-11-11

41Such a restriction can be justified only where it is based on objective considerations and is proportionate to the legitimate objective of the provisions of national law (judgment of 6 September 2016, Petruhhin, C‑182/15, EU:C:2016:630, paragraph 34).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-398/19 · ECLI:EU:C:2020:1032
Decided: 17 Dec 2020
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Kammergericht Berlin (Higher Regional Court, Berlin, Germany)
Rapporteur: K. Jürimäe
Advocate General: G. Hogan
Bench: 15 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.‑C. Bonichot, M. Vilaras, E. Regan, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, A. Kumin, N. Wahl, S. Rodin, F. Biltgen, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, I. Jarukaitis, N. Jääskinen
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0398

Topics

Non-discrimination on grounds of nationality Right of entry and residence

History · 1 version

17 Dec 2020Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions
Cited by 6: CG v The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland (C-709/20); Johannes Dietrich and Norbert Häring v Hessischer Rundfunk (C-422/19, C-423/19); Banco de Portugal and Others v VR (C-504/19); Ministère public v KN (C-219/25 PPU); Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München v S.M (C-237/21)3 provisions; Criminal proceedings against IR (C-105/21)
Cites 16: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Banco Santander SA v Mahamadou Demba and Mercedes Godoy Bonet and Rafael Ramón Escobedo Cortés v Banco de Sabadell SA (C-96/16, C-94/17); Ilmārs Rimšēvičs and European Central Bank v Republic of Latvia (C-202/18, C-238/18); Rudy Grzelczyk v Centre public d'aide sociale d'Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve (C-184/99); Carlos Garcia Avello v Belgian State (C-148/02); Aleksei Petruhhin v Latvijas Republikas Ģenerālprokuratūra (C-182/15)2 provisions; Ruska Federacija v I.N (C-897/19 PPU); Denis Raugevicius (C-247/17); Proceedings brought by Mircea Florian Freitag (C-541/15); Alfredo Rendón Marín v Administración del Estado (C-165/14); Kunqian Catherine Zhu and Man Lavette Chen v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-200/02); Ermira Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-93/18); Romano Pisciotti v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-191/16); Shirley McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-434/09)