Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
De Ruiter vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (C-361/19)
Consideration of the question referred
35

De Ruiter vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (C-361/19)

Judgment of 27 Jan 2021law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-361-19/para_35@2026-11-11

35Thirdly, the Court held that such an interpretation of the legal framework before it was borne out by the principles of equal treatment, proportionality and legal certainty (judgment of 25 July 2018, Teglgaard and Fløjstrupgård, C‑239/17, EU:C:2018:597, paragraph 47).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-361/19 · ECLI:EU:C:2021:71
Decided: 27 Jan 2021
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Administrative Court of Appeal for Trade and Industry, Netherlands)
Applicant: De Ruiter vof
Defendant: Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit
Rapporteur: M. Vilaras
Advocate General: H. Saugmandsgaard Øe
Bench: 5 judges
M. Vilaras, K. Lenaerts, N. Piçarra, D. Šváby, S. Rodin
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0361

Topics

History · 1 version

27 Jan 2021Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 of 17 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the integrated administration and control system, rural development measures and cross compliance; Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008
Cited by 5: Crown Holdings, Inc. and Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH v European Commission (T-587/22); FJ v Agrárminiszter (C-79/23)2 provisions; Grundstücksgemeinschaft Kollaustraße 136 v Finanzamt Hamburg-Oberalster (C-9/20); AS „LatRailNet” and „Latvijas dzelzceļš” VAS v Valsts dzelzceļa administrācija (C-144/20); DB Netz AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-12/20)
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Krüger GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (C-334/95); Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 of 17 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the integrated administration and control system, rural development measures and cross compliance; Gert Teglgaard and Fløjstrupgård I/S v Fødevareministeriets Klagecenter (C-239/17)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003; Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation); T-Systems Magyarország Zrt. and BKK Budapesti Közlekedési Központ v Közbeszerzési Hatóság Közbeszerzési Döntőbizottság (C-263/19); Commission Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 of 30 November 2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 as regards cross-compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system, under the direct support schemes for farmers provided for that Regulation, as well as for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards cross-compliance under the support scheme provided for the wine sector; Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-28/89); Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 of 23 June 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and establishing national restructuring programmes for the cotton sector; Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008; Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009