Judgment_paragraph 49 · K.S. and M.H.K. v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others and R.A.T. and D.S. v Minister for Justice and Equality (C-322/19, C-385/19)

49Next, it must be stated that a difference in the interpretation of a provision of EU law within the national courts is not sufficient, in itself, to justify that the reference for a preliminary ruling be determined pursuant to an expedited procedure. The importance of ensuring uniform application within the European Union of all the provisions which form part of its legal order is inherent in any request made under Article 267 TFEU (see, to that effect, order of the President of the Court of 17 September 2018, Lexitor, C‑383/18, not published, EU:C:2018:769, paragraph 16).